Expose of The Indian Judiciary

While it May be Said that there are a Few good Judges in the Indian Judiciary. I have no Hesitation in Saying that Most are Corrupt. By This I Mean Not the normal Definition of the Word Corrupt but as having an attitude of alleged Superiority viz a viz the Common Man. It is often quoted by them that One Cannot be a Judge of  once Own Case or that One May grow to a high office but is not above the Law.
But When it Comes to the aspect of Judging their own Conduct. They Maintain that they are the Best Persons to Judge their own Conduct or that of a colleague. They Have Assured the Legislatures in that Regard That they will Truth fully and Honestly Judge The Conduct of their colleague. But In Reality have They Done So? No I say The Judgments In the Contempt of Court Particularly in respect of the Conduct of a Judge of the High Court or The Supreme Court The Judges Have Shown Bias and active interest in Protecting the Colleague. I say That though It is undoubtedly true That under Provisions of the Constitution a Judge of the High Court or The Supreme Court can not be removed from office unless There is decision of at least  2/3 Members of the Legislature. The Same cannot be a Ground to Hold That They are not entitled to decide a case of Contempt of Court against their Own Colleague More so When the Constitution as well as The Law of Contempt empowers Them to Do So.  They have Pronounced Judgments that go to Negate the Law by Misquoting the Provisions for their removal. This Aspect is Also True When a Case Of Contempt is Taken out Against an Advocate by a Litigant. It is Often Seen that such a Litigant is Victimized under the very Law. To Cite an Example the Arundhati Roy Case Wherein she was held guilty of Contempt. The said case shows total Disregard to the Peoples rights Where they were rendered homeless under guise of  government requirement. I would like to ask those Judges How would you feel if you were rendered Homeless and live on the roads or temporary shelters albeit for a temporary period of say 2 or 3 years till the Government provides a alternate house.
...........................To Be Continued